Miatapower List Archive

This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Chris P" <(email redacted)>

wow! good on you man! can't wait... "i love the smell of progress in the
morning..."






>From: "Jess Gypin" <(email redacted)>
>To: <(email redacted)>
>Subject: SC car may easily break 200 hp on the dyno
>Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:00:42 -0600
>
>Just a teaser of news here.
>
>We are currently in the process of tuning a upgraded SC system on a Miata.
>1.6 car with W/A intercooler and some other stuff.
>
>First good map with the Link netted 200 hp and 200 lb/ft of torque. This is
>"MLL" horsepower so none of this can be taken as gospel until we get it on
>the dyno.
>
>The next revision of the maps put it at 220 whp and 220 lb/ft of torque.
>Again this is not dyno hp, but MLL calculated hp.
>
>We are hoping to get just a bit more out of it before knock sets in or we
>reach MBT.
>
>Car is boosted to about 12-13 psi. 185-190 kpa.
>
>Jess


_________________________________________________________________
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now!
resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Jess Gypin" <(email redacted)>

Just a teaser of news here.

We are currently in the process of tuning a upgraded SC system on a Miata.
1.6 car with W/A intercooler and some other stuff.

First good map with the Link netted 200 hp and 200 lb/ft of torque. This is
"MLL" horsepower so none of this can be taken as gospel until we get it on
the dyno.

The next revision of the maps put it at 220 whp and 220 lb/ft of torque.
Again this is not dyno hp, but MLL calculated hp.

We are hoping to get just a bit more out of it before knock sets in or we
reach MBT.

Car is boosted to about 12-13 psi. 185-190 kpa.

Jess

This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: <(email redacted)>

Jess,

I have been meaning to ask this since you did Chad's maps, how well does
INJW translate from one car to another? Assuming identical setups, would
you really expect INJW to be close to the same on both cars? I happen to
have a 95-M FMII just like Chad's, so I am curious.

Related to this I thought I read that when new injectors are matched into
sets the company finds 4 that have close flow rates and ships them
together, but that 4 are not necessarily the same as some other 4 they
matched. How much different can different sets be? Is the difference
enough to affect settings between one car and another to a great extent?

I would ask about altitude differences, but I am skeered to head down the
same road that the dyno threads always go!

Lee Thompson



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jess Gypin [mailto:(email redacted)]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:01 PM
> To: (email redacted)
> Subject: SC car may easily break 200 hp on the dyno
>
>
> Just a teaser of news here.
>
> We are currently in the process of tuning a upgraded SC system
> on a Miata.
> 1.6 car with W/A intercooler and some other stuff.
>
> First good map with the Link netted 200 hp and 200 lb/ft of
> torque. This is
> "MLL" horsepower so none of this can be taken as gospel until we
> get it on
> the dyno.
>
> The next revision of the maps put it at 220 whp and 220 lb/ft of torque.
> Again this is not dyno hp, but MLL calculated hp.
>
> We are hoping to get just a bit more out of it before knock sets in or we
> reach MBT.
>
> Car is boosted to about 12-13 psi. 185-190 kpa.
>
> Jess
>
>
>

This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Ray" <(email redacted)>

At high altitudes a turbo car requires less injw for the higher boost zones
since more exhaust backpressure is created in the process of generating the
boost, and that additional backpressure prevents the normal amount of air
from entering the cylinders during intake. It would be nice to have an
atmospheric pressure sensor built into the ECU like the OEM one has.


----- Original Message -----
From: <(email redacted)>
To: "Jess Gypin" <(email redacted)>; <(email redacted)>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:48 AM
Subject: RE: SC car may easily break 200 hp on the dyno


> Jess,
>
> I have been meaning to ask this since you did Chad's maps, how well does
> INJW translate from one car to another? Assuming identical setups, would
> you really expect INJW to be close to the same on both cars? I happen to
> have a 95-M FMII just like Chad's, so I am curious.
>
> Related to this I thought I read that when new injectors are matched into
> sets the company finds 4 that have close flow rates and ships them
> together, but that 4 are not necessarily the same as some other 4 they
> matched. How much different can different sets be? Is the difference
> enough to affect settings between one car and another to a great extent?
>
> I would ask about altitude differences, but I am skeered to head down the
> same road that the dyno threads always go!
>
> Lee Thompson
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jess Gypin [mailto:(email redacted)]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:01 PM
> > To: (email redacted)
> > Subject: SC car may easily break 200 hp on the dyno
> >
> >
> > Just a teaser of news here.
> >
> > We are currently in the process of tuning a upgraded SC system
> > on a Miata.
> > 1.6 car with W/A intercooler and some other stuff.
> >
> > First good map with the Link netted 200 hp and 200 lb/ft of
> > torque. This is
> > "MLL" horsepower so none of this can be taken as gospel until we
> > get it on
> > the dyno.
> >
> > The next revision of the maps put it at 220 whp and 220 lb/ft of torque.
> > Again this is not dyno hp, but MLL calculated hp.
> >
> > We are hoping to get just a bit more out of it before knock sets in or
we
> > reach MBT.
> >
> > Car is boosted to about 12-13 psi. 185-190 kpa.
> >
> > Jess
> >
> >
> >
>
>