Miatapower List Archive
250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
Posted by mailbot
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 04:12 AM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 05:21 AM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Mikael Kallerman" <(email redacted)>
Nice (torque) curve. Unmistakeably Lysholm screw. Hm...makes me wanna dump the turbo and get an sc...
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Peugeot" <(email redacted)>
To: <(email redacted)>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: 250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
>
> Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>
> Mark
>
> home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
>
>
Mail From: "Mikael Kallerman" <(email redacted)>
Nice (torque) curve. Unmistakeably Lysholm screw. Hm...makes me wanna dump the turbo and get an sc...
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Peugeot" <(email redacted)>
To: <(email redacted)>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: 250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
>
> Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>
> Mark
>
> home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
>
>
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 05:51 AM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted)
In a message dated 4/11/02 5:24:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
(email redacted) writes:
> Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>
> Mark
>
>
EXCELLENT!!!!! Now THAT is more like it.....Hello 300 rwhp at 1 bar with a
real exhaust and headwork!!!!
Just great!
Gibb, ex-autorotor
Mail From: (email redacted)
In a message dated 4/11/02 5:24:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
(email redacted) writes:
> Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>
> Mark
>
>
EXCELLENT!!!!! Now THAT is more like it.....Hello 300 rwhp at 1 bar with a
real exhaust and headwork!!!!
Just great!
Gibb, ex-autorotor
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 10:46 AM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted)
Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
230 ft lbs. Ideas?
Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
be due to your altitude...just curious.
Nate
>
> Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>
> Mark
>
> home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
>
>
Mail From: (email redacted)
Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
230 ft lbs. Ideas?
Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
be due to your altitude...just curious.
Nate
>
> Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>
> Mark
>
> home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
>
>
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 11:24 AM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: Robert Circle <(email redacted)>
HP figures show how long you hold on the torque. If your torque peaks
and falls off faster the HP values will be lower.
(email redacted) wrote:
>Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
>though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
>as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
>1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
>numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
>Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
>230 ft lbs. Ideas?
>
>Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
>be due to your altitude...just curious.
>
>Nate
>
>>Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
>>
>>
>
>
Mail From: Robert Circle <(email redacted)>
HP figures show how long you hold on the torque. If your torque peaks
and falls off faster the HP values will be lower.
(email redacted) wrote:
>Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
>though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
>as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
>1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
>numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
>Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
>230 ft lbs. Ideas?
>
>Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
>be due to your altitude...just curious.
>
>Nate
>
>>Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
>>
>>
>
>
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 11:24 AM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: Mark Peugeot <(email redacted)>
Some of it is due to the crappy CA gas, only a little bit of tuning has
been done as we are chasing and killing those prototype gremlins which
must be killed.
I am sure that if we were to use a better quality fuel results would
change dramatically, however that's not really fair. In the end I am sure
that more tuning would result in more favorable torque numbers.
Mark
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, (email redacted) wrote:
> Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
> though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
> as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
> 1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
> numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
> Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
> 230 ft lbs. Ideas?
>
> Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
> be due to your altitude...just curious.
>
> Nate
> >
> > Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
> >
> >
>
Mail From: Mark Peugeot <(email redacted)>
Some of it is due to the crappy CA gas, only a little bit of tuning has
been done as we are chasing and killing those prototype gremlins which
must be killed.
I am sure that if we were to use a better quality fuel results would
change dramatically, however that's not really fair. In the end I am sure
that more tuning would result in more favorable torque numbers.
Mark
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, (email redacted) wrote:
> Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
> though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
> as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
> 1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
> numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
> Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
> 230 ft lbs. Ideas?
>
> Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
> be due to your altitude...just curious.
>
> Nate
> >
> > Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
> >
> >
>
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 01:33 PM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "j. austin" <(email redacted)>
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>Mark, </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>From the looks of the date on that dyno sheet, the car is fast enough to transport you through time... :-) So did anything interesting happen tomorrow. ;-)</P>
<P>Seriously though, Great job!</P>
<P>Jon </P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: Mark Peugeot <(email redacted)>
<DIV></DIV>>To: "(email redacted)" <(email redacted)>
<DIV></DIV>>CC: "(email redacted)" <(email redacted)>
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: 250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Some of it is due to the crappy CA gas, only a little bit of tuning has
<DIV></DIV>>been done as we are chasing and killing those prototype gremlins which
<DIV></DIV>>must be killed.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>I am sure that if we were to use a better quality fuel results would
<DIV></DIV>>change dramatically, however that's not really fair. In the end I am sure
<DIV></DIV>>that more tuning would result in more favorable torque numbers.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Mark
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, (email redacted) wrote:
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>> > Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
<DIV></DIV>> > though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
<DIV></DIV>> > as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
<DIV></DIV>> > 1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
<DIV></DIV>> > numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
<DIV></DIV>> > Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
<DIV></DIV>> > 230 ft lbs. Ideas?
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>> > Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
<DIV></DIV>> > be due to your altitude...just curious.
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>> > Nate
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > > Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > > Mark
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > > home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: <a href='g.msn.com/1HM505401/12'>Click Here</a><br></html>
Mail From: "j. austin" <(email redacted)>
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>Mark, </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>From the looks of the date on that dyno sheet, the car is fast enough to transport you through time... :-) So did anything interesting happen tomorrow. ;-)</P>
<P>Seriously though, Great job!</P>
<P>Jon </P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: Mark Peugeot <(email redacted)>
<DIV></DIV>>To: "(email redacted)" <(email redacted)>
<DIV></DIV>>CC: "(email redacted)" <(email redacted)>
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: 250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Some of it is due to the crappy CA gas, only a little bit of tuning has
<DIV></DIV>>been done as we are chasing and killing those prototype gremlins which
<DIV></DIV>>must be killed.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>I am sure that if we were to use a better quality fuel results would
<DIV></DIV>>change dramatically, however that's not really fair. In the end I am sure
<DIV></DIV>>that more tuning would result in more favorable torque numbers.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Mark
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, (email redacted) wrote:
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>> > Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
<DIV></DIV>> > though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
<DIV></DIV>> > as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
<DIV></DIV>> > 1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
<DIV></DIV>> > numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
<DIV></DIV>> > Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
<DIV></DIV>> > 230 ft lbs. Ideas?
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>> > Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
<DIV></DIV>> > be due to your altitude...just curious.
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>> > Nate
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > > Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > > Mark
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > > home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> > >
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: <a href='g.msn.com/1HM505401/12'>Click Here</a><br></html>
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2002 10:17 PM
Joined 15 years ago
227,243 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: Mark Peugeot <(email redacted)>
Bad date on the computer.
Mark
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, j. austin wrote:
> Mark,
>
> From the looks of the date on that dyno sheet, the car is fast enough to transport you through time... :-) So did
> anything interesting happen tomorrow. ;-)
>
> Seriously though, Great job!
>
> Jon
>
> >From: Mark Peugeot
> >To: "(email redacted)"
> >CC: "(email redacted)"
> >Subject: Re: 250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
> >Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >
> >Some of it is due to the crappy CA gas, only a little bit of tuning has
> >been done as we are chasing and killing those prototype gremlins which
> >must be killed.
> >
> >I am sure that if we were to use a better quality fuel results would
> >change dramatically, however that's not really fair. In the end I am sure
> >that more tuning would result in more favorable torque numbers.
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, (email redacted) wrote:
> >
> > > Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
> > > though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
> > > as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
> > > 1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
> > > numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
> > > Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
> > > 230 ft lbs. Ideas?
> > >
> > > Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
> > > be due to your altitude...just curious.
> > >
> > > Nate
> > > >
> > > > Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > > home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
>
>
Mail From: Mark Peugeot <(email redacted)>
Bad date on the computer.
Mark
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, j. austin wrote:
> Mark,
>
> From the looks of the date on that dyno sheet, the car is fast enough to transport you through time... :-) So did
> anything interesting happen tomorrow. ;-)
>
> Seriously though, Great job!
>
> Jon
>
> >From: Mark Peugeot
> >To: "(email redacted)"
> >CC: "(email redacted)"
> >Subject: Re: 250 RWHP Uncorrected Autorotor.
> >Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >
> >Some of it is due to the crappy CA gas, only a little bit of tuning has
> >been done as we are chasing and killing those prototype gremlins which
> >must be killed.
> >
> >I am sure that if we were to use a better quality fuel results would
> >change dramatically, however that's not really fair. In the end I am sure
> >that more tuning would result in more favorable torque numbers.
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, (email redacted) wrote:
> >
> > > Good HP numbers Mark. One thing I'm curious about
> > > though, is that your torque numbers don't seem as high
> > > as other 1.8 cars I've seen dynoed. For example, most
> > > 1.8 cars have a torque figure very near what their HP
> > > numbers are. My 1.6 dynoed at 215 RWHP and 195 ft lbs.
> > > Seems like with 250 RHWP you should be at least around
> > > 230 ft lbs. Ideas?
> > >
> > > Note: this is certainly not criticism...and might well
> > > be due to your altitude...just curious.
> > >
> > > Nate
> > > >
> > > > Full exhaust on a '99 Miata and 11.5 PSI of boost with Haltech = 250 RWHP.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > > home.networkone.net/~mark/rotor_dyno2.jpg
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
>
>
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.







